Skip to main content

Stop Saying Lives are ‘Lost’ to Gun Violence!

 

Stop Saying Lives are ‘Lost’ to Gun Violence!

Here of late, I've been seeing more and more people use the term 'lost' to describe those taken from us as a result of gun violence. In the most recent mass shooting in Highland Park, Illinois, it became doubly tragic when it became known a 2 year old was discovered wandering alone in the area. Both his parents had been killed. I have yet to see those describing this 2 year old's plight as anything but 'he lost his parents'. That's just wrong! He didn't lose his parents. They were taken from him. They were killed. They were murdered.

Folks, we need to change the mindset. 

Ditch the habit.

People murdered with a gun do not ‘lose’ their lives. Their loved ones don't 'lose' them.

I know, I know – the dictionary defines 'lose' as “to suffer loss through the death of a person”. 

Whose ‘loss’ would that be, though? 

Yours?

Mine?

How about the person who died?

In gun violence vernacular, the word is ‘murdered’.

The very definition of murder (FBI) makes me cringe. It should make EVERYONE cringe because it's f**king CRINGEWORTHY!!! 

Murder involves a ‘taking’. It involves someone’s life being ripped away in a most violent and unforgiving manner. 

There is no sugarcoating that fact.

Old habits die hard. Eliminating clichés from our lexicon of word usage is harder.

I catch myself thinking ‘lives are lost’ more often than I care to admit upon learning of a mass shooting. But I catch and correct myself because that terminology no longer emotionally reflects how I view mass shootings. 

It didn’t used to be that way. 

Mass shootings used to cause me a lot of anxiety, sadness, and serious depression. Now, mass shootings make me angry…very angry. 

‘Lives are lost’ just does not adequately convey that anger any longer as death tolls from mass shootings are made public. In fact, hearing those words to describe fatalities in mass shootings is offensive to me now…seriously offensive. 

So, when I hear anyone (friends, family, media) say ‘lives were lost’ in a mass shooting, that’s a trigger for me (no pun intended). It’s especially so when comparisons to other mass shootings are inevitably made.

It only adds to the problem when pundits and politicians invariably offer some of those very effective (said with tongue firmly planted in cheek) thoughts and prayers to accompany the ‘lives are lost’ mantra. 

No action, but thoughts and prayers should do the trick, eh?

But I digress.

In today’s adversarial gun violence/control/reform debate, using ‘lives are lost’ to describe murder is a cop-out plain and simple.

It isn’t sympathetic.

It isn’t empathetic.

It’s disingenuous. 

It’s disrespectful. 

It’s just as bad as someone offering those well intentioned but thoroughly ineffective thoughts and prayers mentioned previously. 

Someone was killed. 

Someone was murdered. 

Their friends, their families, their loved ones were traumatized.

It is sudden. 

It is violent. 

It is, above all else, fatal.

It doesn’t get any worse than that.

Is it really that difficult to understand that ‘lives are lost’ terminology to describe murders in a mass shooting of any kind – school, movie theater, church, university, home, music venue, and most recently a 4th of July Independence Day parade – can be, and arguably should be, viewed as inappropriate? 

I see the words ‘lives were lost’ used by those keeping track of gun violence statistics.

I see the words ‘lives were lost’ used by relatives.

I see the words ‘lives were lost’ used by friends I’ve never even met on social media. 

I’ve started calling all of them out on this. Some don’t like me doing that. Others have been very accepting. 

I won’t stop.

Until ‘lives were lost’ is no longer used to describe those murdered every time there’s a horrific mass shooting, we’re fighting a losing battle to end gun violence. 

We actually need to get, and stay, angry about use of that label.

Then we need to turn that anger into positive action.

Some are already doing so. More need to be.

Perhaps it’s time to start advocating eliminating the words ‘lives were lost’ from our descriptions of mass shooting victims, and consistently and persistently say what it is – PEOPLE WERE MURDERED!

My two cents.


* Comments on this blog are moderated.

Comments

  1. Hell yes!!!! America must stop sugar coating this and describe what is really happening. -Morena

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RIP Anne Marie

  Anne Marie Hochhalter Born December 19, 1981 Died February 16, 2025 Hero Courageous Fighter Fiercely Independent Survivor Advocate Victim Following her death on February 16, 2025, all of the above adjectives have been used to describe who my daughter, Anne Marie Hochhalter, was. Thing is, I never saw her as such. I saw her as my daughter, my first-born child. She will always remain so. Please don't get me wrong. I do believe some of those accolades listed above must have, in fact, applied to Anne Marie. Otherwise, so many people would not be using them to describe their own knowledge of who she was. I just never got to see them or experience them with her as they applied to her at least from December 2009 until her death. I wasn't allowed to (more on that later). There were snippets here and there in media stories, but that was all I got to experience of her activities. But I digress. As most folks already know, Anne Marie was critically injured during the Columbine massacre....

A "Logical Fallacy" Extraordinaire!

The below graphic has been circulating on pro-gun sites for quite awhile now, at least since 2011. I've seen it pop up in different variations many times since then. I'm  sharing it here for one reason, and one reason only: to try to illustrate something known as a logical fallacy.  Numerical statistics can be both a blessing and a curse especially when they're being used as justification for illustrating one's point of view.....in this case doing nothing when talking about, and discussing possible remedies for gun violence in this country. If this is all we are willing to look at, then woe is us. Maybe we need to start calling them illogical truths. I don't know. It's frustrating. By looking at the graphic we can obviously infer what the message is - do nothing because the number of fatalities by assault style weapons is smaller than anything else and pretty minuscule when compared against both drunk drivers and malpractice deaths. So many gun rights...

Arm Teachers? Let's Make Them 'Emergency Management Specialists' Instead

DO SOMETHING! A refrain used all too often following most mass school shootings. Do something ! Simple. Straightforward. Succinct Easily understood. Because that refrain is used so often following most mass school shootings, it then must also logically follow that there’s an ongoing problem with school safety, right? Are our schools as safe as they can be? It seems a whole lot of people think their schools are NOT safe and that nothing is being done to make them as safe as they need to be! But is that perception accurate? Well, yes and no. Arguably, one of the bigger problems I see with school safety is that when a mass school shooting happens, it’s become ‘normal’ for these incidents to dominate the 24-hour news cycle for a much shorter time than they used to. Please don’t get me wrong. They still garner a whole lot of ‘thoughts and prayers’, but usually for a much shorter period of time. The reality is they simply don’t get the same level of ongoing attention they used to. I should k...